01
Facilitator induction
Hands-on with the kit, walked through the curriculum spine, and given the first term's lessons in detail before you teach one.
For teachers / NanoSkool
You are not being handed a box
Induction before launch, rehearsal in a real classroom, and someone to call in the first term \u2014 when programmes actually fail.
01 — What you get
Support that outlasts the launch week
02
Teacher guide
Subject knowledge written for a non-specialist, with the misconceptions students bring and how to answer what they actually ask.
03
Lesson plans
Every session planned end to end — objective, materials, timing, the build, the discussion, and what to do when it fails.
04
Rubrics and moderation
Assessment criteria and moderation protocols so marking is consistent across a department.
05
Ongoing mentoring
Scheduled check-ins through the first year, because term one is where support matters and where it usually stops.
06
Upskilling and certification
A deeper STEM educator track, with certification, international exchanges and university collaborations.
02 — The promise
You do not need to become an engineer
The most common reason a teacher declines a robotics programme is a reasonable one: they were not trained in it, and being visibly unsure in front of a class is unpleasant.
So the curriculum is written for you rather than for a specialist. You are asked to run a lesson — set it up, keep groups moving, ask good questions, close it properly. The subject knowledge you need for that is in the guide, in the order you need it.